He is surprised to see Zametov, the chief clerk of the police department. He is then introduced to Porfiry. He tells his host of his official business: He had left Alyona Ivanovna some small items not of much value, to which he attached great sentimental value, particularly a watch left him by his father.
If one is to assume that the crime was committed in order to prove a theory, then the flaws in the crime indicate the flaws or incompleteness of the theory.
Raskolnikov had to commit the murder before he had completely formulated the theory. Dostoevsky wanted to show the young intellectual being influenced by various theories and then using these theories before he had had a chance to analyze them.
For example, a typical contradiction would be that Raskolnikov will at one time maintain that the murder was committed to benefit mankind, but then he will maintain that the extraordinary man must be above mankind and not be concerned with what mankind will think of him.
Such an incomplete understanding of his own thoughts and such contradictory statements are the rationale that leads Raskolnikov to the possibility of redemption. The German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel wrote many works on the general nature of the Ubermensch or extraordinary man.
His ideas, however, were never formulated into one consistent thesis. But generally extracted from various parts of his philosophy, his views may be stated with some consistency. In its broadest statement, the Hegelian man exists for noble purposes; if the ends are noble, then the means can be justified.
The emphasis is always on the ends rather than the means. The old pawnbroker is an evil person who is actually harming the poor people who come to her for pawning.
The Extraordinary-Man Theory In “Crime and Punishment” The central image of the novel is Raskolnikov - a young man with an attractive appearance, student who was excluded from the University because of his poverty. Studybay Latest orders Essay Other The Extraordinary-Man Theory In “Crime and Punishment. Crime and Punishment – Raskolnikov’s Extraordinary Man Theory: In the novel, Crime and Punishment, the principle character, Raskolnikov, has unknowingly published a collection of his thoughts on crime and punishment via an article entitled “On Crime. Print Essay | Close Window. The Extraordinary and the Dangerously Experimental Ordinary by Kevin Fox. The extraordinary man in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment is presented in three fashions: the first is Dostoevsky's theory of the extraordinary man, the second is the main character's, Raskolnikov's notion of himself as an extraordinary man .
According to Hegel, any harmful segment of society should be removed. Therefore, Raskolnikov reasons that by murdering the old pawnbroker, he will be removing a harmful "louse" from society. If the ends are noble, the means can be justified.
The old pawnbroker has a lot of money that will be "wasted" upon useless requiem services for her soul after her death. With that money, Raskolnikov will be able to complete his education and devote himself to the service of humanity, or he could distribute the money among needy and starving families, thus saving hundreds of people from ruin and destitution.
Dostoevsky had also apparently encountered other views of the Superman or Ubermensch — views that were not yet formulated in any coherent whole but were heard wherever intellectuals gathered. Svidrigailov was born from these ideas of self-gratification.
Since there is no will or power beyond that of my own, I must completely assert my own will until it is totally free of all restraint against it.
Since there is no power beyond me that functions to punish, I am free to assert completely my own will. Therefore, the Svidrigailov type of Ubermensch is one who possesses the strongest will and is able to make his desires and his power dominant over others.
Svidrigailov can rape a year-old girl and cause the death of a servant without any fear of punishment. He asserts his own will in order to gratify his own desires. The test of this type of Ubermensch is that he must stand completely alone and must not allow his will to be influenced by the wishes of others.
Thus, this assertion of the will isolates man from society.
When Raskolnikov attempts to assert his will, he finds himself cut off from the rest of humanity. It is this dreadful solitude that Raskolnikov cannot stand and that makes him confess to become part of humanity again. For Raskolnikov, all men are divided into two categories: The ordinary man has to live in submission and has no right to transgress the law because he is ordinary.
On the contrary, the extraordinary men have the right to commit any crime and to transgress the law in any way. They are extraordinary because they are the men who have the gift or talent to utter a New Word.
It is the extraordinary men who forge civilization onward to new heights of achievements. The extraordinary man has this inner right to decide whether to overstep the law or any obstacle that stands in the way of the practical fulfillment of his idea, or New Words.
All great men capable of giving something new to society must not submit to the common law because if they do they cease to be great.
Great men create new laws by their discoveries and therefore should have the right to eliminate a few men in order to make their new discoveries known to all of humanity.
Thus, Raskolnikov "sanctions bloodshed in the name of conscience. Again it should be emphasized that, at the time of the murder, Raskolnikov had not worked these various theories into a consistent whole.
All the individual parts were there, but some of the connecting details were missing.
The murder was committed to see whether he dares commit a murder and therefore proves his will is strong.Raskolnikov's theories about the ordinary man versus the extraordinary man are often blurred and indistinct in his own mind. If one is to assume that the crime was committed in order to prove a theory, then the flaws in the crime indicate the flaws or incompleteness of the theory.
Raskolnikov decides to take him up on the challenge of discussing his theory, and embarks into a large discussion of his philosophy of man. Raskolnikov holds that by a law of nature men have been “somewhat arbitrarily” divided into two groups–ordinary and extraordinary.
Razumikhin describes Raskolnikov’s escape while he was delirious as extraordinary, as if Raskolnikov’s sickness and simultaneous ability to act makes him extraordinary () (Fox).
Throughout the novel, the word “extraordinary” appears to challenge the idea that Raskolnikov is an extraordinary man. Published in , Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment, set in St. Petersburg, Russia, describes the story of the young Russian student Raskolnikov, who through the murder of the Ivanovna sisters, attempts to identify himself as either the common man or the so-called “extraordinary” man.
Crime and Punishment – Raskolnikov’s Extraordinary Man Theory: In the novel, Crime and Punishment, the principle character, Raskolnikov, has unknowingly published a collection of his thoughts on crime and punishment via an article entitled “On Crime.
The “extraordinary man” side of Raskolnikov’s personality shows us the destructive nature of self-absorption, which he eventually succeeds in escaping from, due .